Participatory
research
Mapping exercise in Nelson, Lancashire
For
whatever reason it is often the case that some organisations feel that they are
unable to use a pure PLA style approach which will allow local people to drive
the process. In such instances a participatory research approach maybe suitable.
Critics say that such an approach does not allow local people to move forward
and take action based upon the information gathered and so as a result the power
remains with the commissioning agency. Those in favour of such an approach often
see it as the only option when budgets and time are tight. They may feel that
many of the benefits of a participatory approach to working, such as
unintimidating, imaginative and highly visual methods have great value even if
ultimately the information gathered will be used largely by the commissioning
agency. The more power that is given to local people to take the issues forward,
the closer it gets to a PLA style approach.
The following are some examples of participatory research
projects we have run.
Neighbourhood Learning, Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council,
Lancashire, UK 2003
This project involved the design and facilitation of accredited
training (and subsequent mentoring and supervision) for 12 local residents in
participatory research techniques for use in the identification of neighbourhood
learning needs. The researchers used participatory research methods in 12
neighbourhoods around the following themes:
 | Barriers to learning
|
 | Positives and negatives about learning in each
neighbourhood |
 | Learning
communities
|
Researchers used methods with existing groups, on the streets,
in pubs, shops and in resident's houses. To hear what the local resident
researchers felt about the participatory research approach and the project see
the Project Closure Workshop report.
Watch this space for extracts from the final report.
Activate Pendle, Healthy Lifestyle Community Consultation
events, Lancashire, UK 2003.
A series of community consultation events organised by us for
Activate Pendle during March 2003. The events used participatory research
methods to stimulate discussion amongst local residents on the following four
topics:
 |
Understanding of healthy lifestyles
|
 |
Barriers to healthy lifestyles.
|
 |
Behaviour in relation to healthy lifestyles
|
 |
Suggested solutions
|
Activate Pendle is an initiative supported by Burnley, Pendle
and Rossendale Primary Care Trust and Pendle Borough Council. Events took place
at a number of locations identified by Activate Pendle:
 |
Colne, (St. Johns Church). Thursday 27 March, (7-9pm)
|
 |
Nelson, (Civic Theatre). Saturday 29 March (11.30am – 2pm)
|
 |
Brierfield, (Community Centre). Sunday 30 March, (5.15-7pm) |
Each event took the form of a series of ‘activity stations’
which local people could visit and voice their opinions on healthy lifestyles.
Each activity station hosted a different participatory research method designed
to stimulate discussion. Methods used were as follows:
 |
Body Map. Participants are asked to record their answer to
the question ‘What is a healthy lifestyle?’ on to a large outline of a
body.
|
 |
Daily Activity Chart. Participants record the structure of
an average day and then discuss barriers to healthy lifestyles and possible
future action steps. |
 |
Mapping. Through the use of a large map of the local area
participants discuss the concept of healthy lifestyles in their
neighbourhood. (see Figure 7)
|
 |
Drawing. Adults and young people are invited to draw their
vision of a healthy community and then discuss their own community. |
 |
Video talk Box. Those participants who feel comfortable on
camera are asked to record their opinions on video in private.
|
The participatory research methods described above were used
during the consultation events for the following reasons:
 |
Residents could come and go from the event as they pleased
so allowing those with minimal time to still be involved.
|
 |
Different people feel comfortable communicating in different
ways. Making available a variety of communication forms increases the
chances of a broad spectrum of people contributing.
|
 |
Such methods are designed to allow local people to lead
discussions and so talk about the issues that are important to them.
|
 |
Many people enjoy the relaxed, informal, unintimidating,
visual nature of such methods.
|
|